We promised different than what we will deliver. In the presentation it should be clear that the separation will be made between objects and these objects will be classified as metal, plastic and paper.
Even if we did this, the classes were not thought beforehand. This is a very important part of the project and requirements, because it may inviabilizate the project.
The network model, dataset creation and its training were also a big uncertainty problem brought by Heitor. He suggested a transfer learning model to extract image features and then a network to detect the objects from those features.
[x] List of objects that will be classified, considering the most common trashes in universities
[x] Report with dataset specification (e.g. how to label, images requirements, needs boundary box or not, how many images per object, etc.
[x] List of objects that will be used for the proof of concept, considering the classes that are most common and most critical (similar to each other)
[x] Dataset creation for proof of concept
[ ] Report with transfer learning model and how it will be applied in our case. Specify EVERYTHING (extractor, language, augmentation methods, layers removed, etc. as if it were a paper)
[ ] Report with the results of the proof of concept, with adequate performance measurement considering the classes and the network used
[x] Risk response plan for case of proof of concept goes wrong
Check risks management
The project, as presented, suggests that the object can be anywhere in the chamber and the sensor should detect it from anywhere. This implies also that the object could be anywhere for the image.